Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 301 - 320 of 2,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Case date: 12 January 2024 Case number: No. 21-55881 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition by… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:31 am by Linda Panszczyk
Case date: 26 January 2024 Case number: No. 22-10866 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Concise European Design Law by Verena von Bomhard and Alexander von Mühlendahl€ 125 Genuine Use of Trademarks, Second Edition by… [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:13 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___, ___ (2019) (lead opinion) (slip op., at 14) (The Supremacy Clause cannot "be deployed" "to elevate abstract and unenacted legislative desires above state law"); Alexander v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Overton v. [read post]
26 May 2025, 6:16 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
A special thank you to Alexander Sakin, counsel for Cheshun, who sent me a copy of this article’s opinion. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
       By contrast, if a convention follows the ratification process under Article V, any change would require approval of thirty-eight state legislatures or state conventions. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Lawrence Solum
I conclude that the much maligned “excessive government entanglement” test of Lemon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 11:28 am
Alexander as Director of the NSA and Chief of the Central Security Service. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm by Juan Antunez
Here's why: Alexander argues that the decision to stay his federal action conflicts with Marshall v. [read post]