Search for: "State v. Andersen" Results 301 - 320 of 357
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
Protection Corp. v BDO Seidman, 95 NY2d 702, 711, 746 N.E.2d 1042, 723 N.Y.S.2d 750; see Credit Alliance Corp. v Arthur Andersen & Co., 65 NY2d 536, 553-554, 483 N.E.2d 110, 493 N.Y.S.2d 435). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:08 pm
Photo Mermadon See Also: Judge Orders Legal Fees in RIAA v Andersen RIAA Defends Refiling Contested Piracy Case With New Judge Professors Siding With Jammie Thomas in RIAA Case Lawyer: RIAA Gets Sleazy in Disputed Downloading Lawsuit Senate Committee Approving AM-FM Royalty Bill Broadcasters Playing Race Card of Sorts in AM-FM Royalty Flap A Scholarly Look at the 'Making Available' Dispute Universities Baffled By Massive Surge In RIAA Copyright… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:02 pm
Three of the Big Four recording companies are based outside of the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 11:33 pm
Andersen File-Share With Immunity: Go to Harvard [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 6:01 am
The always-alert Ellen Podgor notes that former Enron Task Force chief Andrew Weissmann (see also here and here) recently wrote an amicus brief on behalf of various business and defense-oriented organizations in the United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:54 pm
The petition suggests that the court of appeals should have expressly evaluated the reasonableness of the award under the framework set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 May 2008, 6:22 am by Doug Panzer, Esq.
In two separate cases, the RIAA was ordered to pay $103,000 in legal fees to defendant Tanya Andersen and also learned that the judge in the Jammie Thomas case is leaning toward granting a new trial to the woman who has so far been the biggest loser in the RIAA law suits.In Atlantic v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
It assumes there is a "making available" right in the United States, which even the RIAA knows is not so -- as evidenced by its removal of that theory from its complaints once Judge Brewster held that its complaint fails to state a claim in Interscope v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:54 am
Andersen Family Associates v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
Tanya Andersen has filed her amended complaint in her class action, Andersen v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:00 am
United States CellularJudge Dow1:07-cv-02883             Kids Hope USA, Inc. v. [read post]