Search for: "State v. Barker"
Results 301 - 320
of 397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2017, 12:32 pm
In 2014, the US Supreme Court issued decided the case of Alice Corp v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
. in Hahn v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 6:24 am
Barker, (1745) 26 ER 15, 33. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 9:04 am
S.A. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:32 am
Barker represents one major decision of significance. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Judge William Alsup stated that under Barker v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:04 pm
Barker on December 15, 2005 and addressed to all CTF staff stated, "Central Facility is currently experiencing a severe shortage of housing forinmates with Lower Bunk Chronos. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:15 am
Cody v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:37 pm
Barker, 385 S.C. 45, 65, 682 S.E.2d 843, 853 (Ct. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 900 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1990)* King v. [read post]
21 Dec 2024, 9:07 am
Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
(as he then was) stated in Collins v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
By a letter dated 21 May 2008 Lisa Barker, the Council's interim head of housing, referred to “discrepancies” in the gas safety certificates supplied by FRE in respect of fifteen properties. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
" Barker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:23 pm
Supreme Court in Barker v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:17 pm
Analyzing his claim under the four-factor balancing test set forth in Barker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
In Omychund v Barker (1745) 1 Atk, 21, 49; 26 ER 15, 33, Lord Harwicke stated that no evidence was admissible unless it was `the best that the nature of the case will allow’. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:11 am
In Barker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]
