Search for: "State v. Barks" Results 301 - 320 of 381
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2010, 1:10 pm by Eric
A subtle but unmistakable rebuke to the state consumer watchdogs that they barked up the wrong tree. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 7:46 pm by Rick
Lee immediately began trying to move on, as he barked out that the language of the initiative, wherein it states, “Notwithstanding any other provision of law…,” meant that Proposition 19 would not negatively impact existing laws. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 10:20 am by Mike Inman
No Pet Policy Does Not Violate State or Federal Fair Housing Acts Hawn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA's auditor also stated that Miracle Star did not provide adequate records for the audit, which caused the auditor to be unable to determine if Miracle Star had provided all specific services stated in the contract. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:53 am by Russ Bensing
  First this:  On Tuesday, in State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 6:31 am by Adam Chandler
” Commentary on the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Beck, et al.
That sounds almost exactly like the claim made against the defendants in the Bone Screw litigation – and which, when presented as a state-law claim, was unanimously held preempted in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm by Erin Miller
In some instances, like in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 11:01 pm by charonqc
Barking Mad wrote: Personally, I don’t think this goes far enough!. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:01 pm by Kim Krawiec
Via Tyler Cowen, from Barking Up The Wrong Tree: "[P]itchers from the southern United States were more likely to hit batters in these situations, but primarily if the batter was White. [read post]