Search for: "State v. Batson"
Results 301 - 320
of 516
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
" EVIDENCE, IMMIGRATION LAW Leng v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:07 am
Nearly six months later, he returned to ask the very same question to the state’s counsel in Benisek v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 12:21 am
United States U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
California Equal Protection Jury Selection — Batson Challenges: Snyder v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:30 pm
"Nearly 25 years after Batson v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court, May 03, 2010 Renico v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
The Court wrote its own QP, limiting review to: "Whether the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in how it applied Batson v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm
Indeed, in the seminal case of Batson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Various Supreme Court Justices (including Thurgood Marshall in Batson itself and Stephen Breyer a decade ago in Miller-El v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 10:43 am
Supreme Court should intervene to enforce its precedents following Batson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2019, 8:09 am
Supreme Court case, Batson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 10:21 am
It raises the following 18 claims for relief:CLAIM ONEDURING PEACETIME, ALLOWING A MEMBER OF THE ARMED FORCES TO BE SENTENCED TO DEATH BY A COURT-MARTIAL PANEL OF LESS THAN TWELVE, WHEN THERE IS NO FIXED PANEL SIZE, PROMOTES UNRELIABILITY, UNDERMINES THE RIGHT TO AN IMPARTIAL FACT FINDER AND SENTENCER AND CREATES AN ARBITRARY FACTOR IN VIOLATION OF THE FIFTH, SIXTH AND EIGHTH AMENDMENTSCLAIM TWOIN A CAPITAL COURT-MARTIAL DURING PEACETIME, THE CONVENING AUTHORITY'S POWER TO HAND-PICK MILITARY… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
The Court’s decision appeared to be a straightforward application of the 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:04 am
Lagone SULLIVAN COUNTYCriminal Practice Mistrial Declared in Hunting Trial; Court Finds 'Batson-Like' Violation, But No Cure People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:04 pm
An interesting side issue will be what happens if one of the objecting party’s alternate strikes would, if exercised, violate the Batson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:45 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
State of New York Div. of Hous. [read post]
