Search for: "State v. Bear King"
Results 301 - 320
of 634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
While the sponsoring business and parties serving as the plan administrator or other fiduciaries of the plan all have potential legal risk if the plan is not administered in accordance with the ACA claims and appeals procedures or other requirements covered by the Form 8928 filing requirements, all parties need to be mindful of the distinctions between the Form 8928 and other exposures that a sponsoring employer bears under the Code as compared to the ERISA fiduciary… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and ensure the internet data sharing and other applications and portals… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
If you adopt Justice Holmes’s approach in his famed Lochner dissent — that the Chief Justice so lovingly invoked in King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Other coverage and commentary focus on Thursday’s decision in King v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
We may also disagree over who bears the burden of showing that a law is constitutional or unconstitutional. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Debating King v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
First, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
As a law student and constitutional law scholar, I am surprised that the Supreme Court opted to take King on appeal. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
See McIntyre v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:21 am
” He went on to call King v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:07 am
Assuming that the three main state organs are designed bearing in mind their key functions, such judicial interference in the administration requires specific justification. [read post]
9 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Burger King Corp., 433 So.2d 540, 541 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); and City of Tamarac v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 6:42 pm
Justice Rouleau stated in O’Donohue v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
Shammas v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:53 pm
Kings Co. 2011). [read post]
