Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 301 - 320 of 1,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Julian Knowles J will hear an application concerning costs in the case of London Borough of Croydon v Dodsworth. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 9:32 am by Giles Peaker
And as the number of out of borough/cross London accommodation placements continues to rise, faster than ever, this is significant. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, involves whether private operators of public access channels are state actors subject to constitutional liability under the First Amendment. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 9:19 am by Amanda Sanders
  In Ladele v London Borough of Islington [2010] a Christian registrar refused to carry out civil partnership ceremonies on the basis that same sex relationships were contrary to her religious beliefs. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
KBBI News reports that an Alaska state trial court judge yesterday in Hunt v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 11:43 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The High Court has given two judgements in a recent case involving a landlord and Richmond London Borough Council. [read post]