Search for: "State v. C. D."
Results 301 - 320
of 13,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 2:26 am
du Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele2 Polska sp zo o (now Netia SA) Case C-375/09; [2011] WLR (D) 149“A national competition authority, having examined whether there was an abuse of a dominant position pursuant to its own national law and pursuant to article 102FEU of the FEU Treaty (ex article 82EC of the EC Treaty), was not entitled to take a decision stating that there had been no breach of article 102FEU of the FEU Treaty. [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
For my money, the most interesting is Yates v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:17 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Veazie, 8 How. 251, 255–256 (1850); United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
§ 5321(a)(5)(C)(i) (2004), supersedes 31 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 4:25 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 11:27 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
C. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 9:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
Wall v Circle C Construction, LLC, No. 16-6169 and is before the court for the third time.Facts: Defendant, Circle C Construction, a family-owned general contractor built 42 warehouses for the United States Army in Kentucky and Tennessee. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
App. 550, 560 (2014) (quoting State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
TTABlogger comment: Since the marks are not similar for Section 2(d) purposes, how can they be similar for Section 43(c) purposes? [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 9:36 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
The U.S. appointed Julie Bédard and Canada named Mark C. [read post]
