Search for: "State v. C. Kelly"
Results 301 - 320
of 550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
UMG v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
KELLY, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:00 am
In this, the court again diverged from Kelly, 817 F. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Minors Mulder-Westrate, Kelli M. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:08 pm
(mem. op.); Kelly v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Considering the “serious nature” of the Supervisor’s misconduct, the court said that the penalty imposed, dismissal, did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32 and Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
ROCHON, JR., KELLY KITTRELL, RUSSELL MACK, C & R SERVICES, INC. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
ROCHON, JR., KELLY KITTRELL, RUSSELL MACK, C & R SERVICES, INC. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
There’s a twofer out of the Sunshine State, Kelly v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 5:52 am
C, Brown Dep. at 35:21–22.) [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:25 pm
" Kelly v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
MANNING CONSTRUCTION v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:25 am
MANNING CONSTRUCTION v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
KF 480 W433 2012 Understanding disability law / Mark C. [read post]
