Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 301 - 320 of 13,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
For example, a lawyer moving from one firm to another might find herself expected to participate in a case in which she was involved in her former firm; this might raise questions of confidentiality, as well as adherence to other law society rules (R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
State, (Idaho Law Review, Vol. 59, Forthcoming).Linda C. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Michael Oykhman
In R v Stone, 1999 CanLII 688 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 290, the Supreme Court of Canada defined automatism as “a state of impaired consciousness. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:04 am by Michael Oykhman
In R v Stone, 1999 CanLII 688 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 290, the Supreme Court of Canada defined automatism as “a state of impaired consciousness. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:29 am by Frank Cranmer
The decision in R (on the application of Fox) v Secretary of State for Education [2015] EWHC 3404 (Admin) concerned the new subject content issued for GCSE Religious Studies. [read post]
29 May 2023, 2:40 pm by Bill Marler
Full text available online at http://www.sepeap.org/archivos/pdf/11191.pdf Janneke, C, et al. [read post]
27 May 2023, 11:05 am by Russell Knight
R. 219(c)(iv) Authenticating An Email Before Putting The Email Into Evidence. [read post]
25 May 2023, 3:00 pm
” Grupo R’s liens arose when it caused the MAYA and MARANGO to be attached under Texas state law. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . strictly limited; the court is not allowed to render a determination upon a thorough review of the relevant facts adduced by both parties, but rather is substantially more constrained in its review, examining only the plaintiff’s pleadings and affidavits” (Carr v Wegmans Food Mkts., Inc., 182 AD3d 667, 668 [3d Dept 2020]; see John R. [read post]