Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 301 - 320
of 37,562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 9:07 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinion: State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
They are supported by Georgia and 18 other states. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
S. 1301, 1303 (2012) (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
More than two decades after the shock of Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
§ 1881a(f)(2)(C), (D). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:29 am
In VX v Gemeinde Ummendorf (C-456/22), the CJEU found that there is no de minimis threshold for damage, below which individuals cannot claim for compensation. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:24 am
” Similarly in A, B, and C v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:27 pm
ASIC was, however, successful in submitting that the uncertainty or unintelligibility of a term causes detriment to a consumer’s rights and obligations within the meaning of s 12BG(1)(c). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:50 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:38 pm
That trial court ruled that the school’s relief from federal taxes under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code was tantamount to “receiving Federal financial assistance” for purposes of Title IX, according to the District Court in the Buttner-Hartsoe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
In Easter v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
C. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:11 am
From yesterday's argument in Fischer v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
