Search for: "State v. Carbone" Results 301 - 320 of 1,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 11:08 am by Vicki Shiah
”  The Tailoring Rule makes regulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions practicable by setting the threshold for the applicability of the CAA’s Title V and prevention of significant deterioration (“PSD”) permit requirements at 100,000 tons per year (“tpy”) for new sources and 75,000 tpy for modified sources. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:43 am by Paula Lombardi
Recently, two cases State of Netherlands v Urgenda (December 20, 2019) and Juliana v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
StateCitation: 2009 WY 35Docket Number: S-08-0065Appeal from the District Court of Carbon County, Honorable Wade E. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
EllisCitation: 2009 WY 16Docket Number: S-07-0256Appeal from the District Court of Carbon County, the Honorable Wade E. [read post]
14 May 2009, 5:10 am
A voltage difference V between two spaced apart electrodes is brought to a selected value and held, the holdoff time interval à [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:25 am by Deborah Heller
On Friday, Chief Justice Roberts signed an Order halting discovery and the trial scheduled to begin October 29 in Juliana v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:53 am by Unknown
Lastly, an “ESG-focused fund” would be a fund that has one or more ESG factors as a significant or main consideration in selecting investments or for engaging with the companies in which it invests.The latter type of fund, an “ESG-focused fund,” that indicates it considers environmental factors, would also have to disclose aggregated GHG emissions metrics for the portfolio for the relevant reporting period that include: (1) the portfolio’s carbon footprint and… [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
C2R instead argued that its ads conveyed that its products render approximately the stated number of pills “safe for disposal” (not fully deactivated) using a variety of mechanisms, activated carbon adsorption being one. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:28 am
First, the opinion, before reaching the merits, states that 4 votes (without Justice Sotomayor weighing in) remain in support of Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 6:04 pm
  Arguably, it also cannot be squared with the ruling last April of a sharply divided (5-4) Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. [read post]