Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 301 - 320
of 193,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
This case looks more like a house search version of Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:06 am
The Court consolidated the cases Maine Community Health Options v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:15 am
The Oregon Supreme Court decided on Friday, 6/1/07, in State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm
The post DAVID NORTON PORTER v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:50 am
The post VAUGHN AVERY WATSON, SR. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:49 pm
On April 23, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:18 pm
United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 2:49 pm
On April 23, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:39 am
Rahman and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Case C-83/11; [2012] WLR (D) 259 “Member states of the EU were not required to grant every application for entry or residence submitted by family members of a Union citizen who did not fall under the definition in article 2(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC of 29 April 2004 , even if they showed, in accordance with article 10(2), that they were dependants of… [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:54 pm
Both cases involved... [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm
North Dakota, “that a State may not require out-of-state sellers of goods or services to collect that State’s sales/use tax, unless the out-of-state seller has some ‘physical presence’ in the State – a retail outlet, warehouse, office, or the like” This term’s case of South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 5:18 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:15 am
United States, a case pending in U.S. [read post]
