Search for: "State v. Cotton" Results 301 - 320 of 537
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm by admin
In Southern Cotton Oil v Anderson, the precedent-setting case from 1920, Florida Supreme Court justices decided that cars were inherently dangerous. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 2:51 pm by Angie Gou
Tom Cotton, R-Ark., criticized Prelogar for her role in the shifting positions. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
That question was answered in 1936, by the Beaumont Court of Appeals in the case, Love et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
Cotton, 13-551, a qualified immunity claim arising in the case of a man shot because of a license-plate typo, and Martinez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:04 am by Susan I. Nelson
Alabama still can’t bar them from enrolling, since the Supreme Court declared in Plyler v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:30 am by Holly Brezee
The report, entitled “Adjusting to Alice: USPTO patent examination outcomes after Alice Corp. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Archuleta 13-607Issue: Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by reversing the United States Merit Systems Protection Board's (MSPB) interpretation of its enabling statute and extending Department of the Navy v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 12:26 am by Frank Cranmer
The prohibition came before Queensland’s State Court of Appeal in Athwal v State of Queensland  [2023] QCA 156, in which Ms Kamaljit Kaur Athwal argued that the ban was discriminatory. [read post]