Search for: "State v. Curtis" Results 301 - 320 of 813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 8:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Justice Curtis rejected this argument, and stated, [30] These laws, while directed at and defined by the parents’ legal status, functioned to disadvantage the children, who were blameless and innocent of decisions their parents made. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 11:19 am by Scott Harman
Seamus Hughes and Bennett Clifford detailed how the capture of Soulay Noah Su, a 16-year-old United States citizen ostensibly fighting for the Islamic State in Syria, represents a departure from the norms that apply to most foreign-born ISIS fighters. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:56 am
State, Georgia, United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:58 pm
" Curtis-Wright came out after the Oregon district court's decision in Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am by Timothy Powers O'Neill
Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., 710 F.2d 678, 690 (11th Cir.1983) (noting that a “federal court applying state law is bound to adhere to decisions of the state’s intermediate appellate courts absent some persuasive indication that the state’s highest court would decide the issue otherwise”); McMahan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 4:30 am by Kevin
Over the weekend I wrote about Lodi v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm by Blog Editorial
The final case, Tabeel Lewis v The State is also from the Republic of Trinidad & Tobago and will be heard on Thursday 10 March 2011. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:01 am
The decision is Curtis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court takes up Flowers v. [read post]