Search for: "State v. D. Z."
Results 301 - 320
of 417
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
D. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Defense counsel’s forged email confirms non-compliance with multiple discovery orders and warrants terminating sanctions: FURminator v PetVac (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Answer regarding whether a test was performed does not violate privilege: Itex, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
Ohlbaum.Ohlbaum, Edward D. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
The EarthGrain Co. k/n/a Sara Lee Bakery Group, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Reservation of right to appeal claim construction prompting stipulated judgment does not create substantial controversy as to declaratory judgment counterclaims: The Fox Group, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
D. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 10:36 am
városi Bíróság (step up, Tibor Gold, and tell us how to pronounce those precious syllables) has referred some questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling in Case C-180/11 Bericap Záródástechnikai Bt. v Plastinnova 2000 Kft. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:34 am
Net MoneyIn, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:58 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Elk Ridge Lodge, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:27 am
(Chicago IP Litigation) SimpleAir – E D Texas denies motion to transfer: SimpleAir v AWS Convergence (EDTexweblog.com) Smith & Wesson Corp. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
This decision deals with an interesting case of transmission of the opponent status. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:59 am
du Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele 2 Polska sp. z o.o., now Netia SA. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:23 am
du Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów v Tele 2 Polska sp. z o.o., now Netia SA. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
