Search for: "State v. E. C." Results 301 - 320 of 9,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2021, 10:38 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
The State’s one-year limit for published privacy violations governs biometric privacy claims under only section 15(c) and 15(d), while claims under 15(a), 15(b) and 15(e) can be brought up to five years later, the three-judge panel ruled. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
  We also rely on state law to decide what agents are appointed "by law" under Rule 4(e)(2)(C). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
” But “[c]lickwrap agreements are increasingly common and have routinely been upheld. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
On June 16, 2019, the Assemblée nationale du Québec passed the Act respecting the laicity of the State. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
A picturesque safe harbour in Alicante.In Google France (Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08) and L’Oréal  (Case C-324/09), the Court of Appeal noted, the CJEU clearly stated that the safe harbour applies whenever an ISP “has not played an active role of such a kind as to give it knowledge of, or control over, the data stored”. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2]respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The recitals to the ECD give more detail as to the scope of services protected by Article 14 and there is a certain amount of case law on this point, notably Google Adwords (Case C-236/08) and the Grand Chamber decision in L’Oreal v. eBay (Case C-324/09). [read post]