Search for: "State v. Fries"
Results 301 - 320
of 573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
So held the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its August 20, 2014 decision in Matter of Gribeluk v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:20 am
Settle v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:52 am
<> Sierra Club v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:44 am
Recently, the United States Patent and Trademark Office proposed changes to the rules of practice pertaining to the patent term adjustment provisions in view of the decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Novartis AG v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
“No other nation,” Charles Fried has written, “claims as fierce and stringent a system of legal protection for speech. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:23 am
Sometimes you can have your fried chicken and eat it too, but not all of the time. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:27 am
Prior to trial, dispositive motions winnowed the plaintiff’s claims down to two causes of action: hostile work environment and a state wage claims violation. [read post]
4 May 2014, 9:00 pm
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the D.C. [read post]
2 May 2014, 1:09 pm
The Apple v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
A recent case, Pinder v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:19 am
Garden Catering-Hamilton Avenue, LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:23 pm
Co., 46 N.Y.2d 276, 281-282, 413 N.Y.S.2d 309, 385 N.E.2d 1238; Fried v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Attempts to give certainty—but sometimes what you think is a clear definition becomes more complex, as in Apple v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm
The morning’s proceedings begin with a return to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in the attack on the French oil tanker the M/V Limburg in Yemen in October 2002. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:05 am
One supervisor in particular, a sergeant, made many comments about the black officers and fried chicken, that they would be happy that watermelon was being served and, during line-up, stating that those officers made it “dark in the corner. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:50 am
Ignat v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
In the "indirect burden" cases such as the Sherbert line, then, the Court was striving to identify those state actions short of direct legal compulsion that had the same practical effect on religious exercise as does a specific legal command that prevents such exercise--as Solicitor General Fried put the point in his brief in Hobbie v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:01 pm
Maybe this is one reason South Carolina is in the top ten states with the most grease and cooking-related claims in November, according to State Farm data. [read post]
