Search for: "State v. G. L. D."
Results 301 - 320
of 1,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2008, 4:54 pm
L. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 3:36 am
., appeal after remand Million v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
Donoghue, President of the Court.La Cour internationale de Justice (CIJ), organe judiciaire principal de l'Organisation des Nations Unies, rend, le 16 mars 2022, son ordonnance sur la demande en indication de mesures conservatoires présentée par l'Ukraine en l'affaire relative à des Allégations de génocide au titre de la convention pour la prévention et la répression du crime de… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
The Problem of Orchid Pots --Problem 4 --Hermès Int'l v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
SeeRestatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, reporters notes to comment l (1998). [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench) Veolia Water Central Ltd v London Fire & Emergency Planning Authority [2010] EWHC 208 (QB) (09 February 2010) Moore v Hotelplan Ltd (t/a Inghams Travel) & Anor [2010] EWHC 276 (QB) (22 February 2010) Rutherford v Seymour Pierce Ltd [2010] EWHC 375 (QB) (11 February 2010) Law Society of England and Wales v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWHC 352 (QB) (26 February 2010) High Court (Chancery… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am
Arizona (f, g, w) 2.50% > $0 2.50% > $0 $13,850 $27,700 n.a. n.a. $100 credit Arkansas 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,270 $4,540 $29 credit $58 credit $29 credit (d, h, i, o, oo) 4.00% > $4,300 4.00% > $4,300 4.90% > $8,500 4.90% > $8,500 California 1.00% > $0 1.00% > $0 $5,202 $10,404 $140 credit $280 credit $433 credit (a, i, k, l, m, n, o, rr) 2.00% > $10,099 2.00%… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
" Debra L. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am
L. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 10:46 am
In Liu v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Binette, 2020 QCCDPHA 29 (CanLII) [37] Conformément à l’arrêt Anthony-Cook[3] de la Cour suprême du Canada, c’est le critère de l’intérêt public qui doit guider le juge lorsqu’il est saisi d’une recommandation conjointe des parties relativement à la peine à imposer à une personne déclarée coupable d’une infraction criminelle. [38] Dans… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
That also means that it will be as important for states to provide a means of training people to read and assess these reports as it is for states to develop the ability to produce them. 6. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Karimi Alavijeh, 2022 QCCDPHA 28 (CanLII) [80] La Cour d’appel du Québec fait ainsi sienne la position de la Cour d’appel de l’Alberta, qui enseigne que pour déterminer si une recommandation conjointe est ou non contraire à l’intérêt public, il ne s’agit pas pour le juge de rechercher la sentence qu’il juge lui-même appropriée et la comparer à celle faisant… [read post]
