Search for: "State v. Hague"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2023, 11:06 am
Zuru, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Ratifications were exchanged at The Hague on May 31, 1889. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day, RPost Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
The Canadian decision's in Bouzari v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
The ILC’s interpretation of the prosecute or extradite principle aligns with the reasoning of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the 2012 Belgium v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
(citing Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:02 pm
Today, the Eleventh Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Fuentes-Rangel v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:59 am
” (quoting Ruiz v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 3:06 pm
In Galaviz, v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:01 pm
Saada v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 9:08 am
On Wednesday, the court heard oral argument in Water Splash v. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 10:43 am
Anderson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 7:59 pm
During the early stages of my legal career, I had the opportunity to work on a tragic case, Khan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:01 pm
Norinder v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
Braden v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
In Nylock Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
The retention of a child in one contracting state will be “wrongful” in terms of Article 3 of the Hague Convention, if that retention is in breach of “rights of custody” enjoyed by the other parent under the law of the contracting state “where the child was habitually resident immediately before the removal or retention”. [read post]
