Search for: "State v. Harness"
Results 301 - 320
of 496
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:09 am
United States, might simultaneously be at risk of quiet abrogation by the operation of predictive analytics. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 7:00 am
United States, are at risk of quiet abrogation by the operation of predictive analytics. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
In this week’s case (Mosimann v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
For instance, back in 1985, Robert Levinson complained of a contract with the Eckerd Foundation for the management of the Okeechobee School for Boys in which “[v]irtually every” contract item concerned input activities and pertained to administrative/operational functions. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:18 pm
His conclusion is not, as Slate’s typically misleading headline states, “Let the NSA Keep Hold of the Data. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too… [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
Professor Nalini Ambady (1959-2013) Bonjours de Toulouse, where I'm visiting this month at the Institute for Advanced Study (IAST), which is hosted by the Université de Toulouse Capitole and physically (and in many senses conceptually) situated inside the Toulouse School of Economics. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Langfan v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
This flows from the SCC decisions in Ontario (AG) v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:04 pm
The two workers wearing harnesses survived. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm
[1] The quoted phrases are from the Third Circuit in Drax v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:19 am
In Williamson v Delsener (59 AD3d 291, 291), the Appellate Division, First Department, stated that "emails exchanged between counsel, which contained their printed names at the end, constitute signed writings (CPLR 2104) within the meaning of the statute of frauds. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 1:21 pm
Vasquez v Cohen Bros. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 3:20 am
How the Political Structure Seems to Harness the Power of Lebanon’s Non-State Armed Group Gary LaFree, Erin Miller & Sue-Ming Yang, Terrorism in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, 1970 to 2008 Magnus Ranstorp, ‘Lone Wolf Terrorism’. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
Local actors harnessed the counter-hegemonic potential of law to shape, direct, and contest the American state. [read post]
