Search for: "State v. K. D."
Results 301 - 320
of 2,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Southern District of New York stated that it was “awarding [the defendant] its fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:39 pm
D’Agostino v. ev3, Inc., 845 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016), was seen as a death knell for the fraud‑on-the-FDA theory in FCA cases. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
See Manfredo v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:53 pm
Supp. 1392 (D. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
No drugs were found upon searching, but the K-9 officer stated that Eckert had previously been arrested several times on drug possession charges, and was known to hide drugs in his rectum. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:58 pm
State, a possession of cocaine case out of Taylor County:Appellant's opening - Stan BrownState's response - Patricia K. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:44 pm
In an August 24, 2018 opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
The European Union, pursuant to the Treaty on European Union, and the United States of America shall ensure that the provisions of this Agreement are applied in relation to bilateral extradition treaties between the Member States and the United States of America, in force at the time of the entry into force of this Agreement, under the following terms: (a) Article 4 shall be applied in place of bilateral treaty provisions that authorize extradition exclusively with respect… [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:37 am
Dist. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:31 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Enri Franklin v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
§1125(d). [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 8:59 am
(Patricia K. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:20 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
LANDWEHR, a/k/a DEANA STREUBING v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm
Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit released its opinion in Latif v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
