Search for: "State v. Lámar" Results 301 - 320 of 412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Bexis
Mar. 23, 2010) (complaint “only asserts a state law, without reference to a federal violation, [and] is preempted”); McQuiston v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm by Kenneth S. Nankin
  Airlines Tackle $1.4 Billion Online Fraud Challenge, Cybersource (Mar. 16, 2009). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:38 pm by Steven Boutwell
Mar. 12, 2008), the Middle District of Louisiana dealt with a civil rights violation. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:45 am
S & S Enterprises, Inc., - So. 3d -, 2010 WL 838164 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 12, 2010) and Soledispa v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
OHIM, José María Padilla Requena (1709 Blog) Inbev loses Budweiser CTM appeal: Anheuser-Busch Inc. v OHIM, Bud? [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., 892 A.2d 694, (N.J. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
-Conn (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): All threats, no action…: Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL (IPKat)   United States  US General California’s Trade Secret disclosure statute doesn’t apply in Federal Court – or maybe it does (IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO wants to change restriction practice (Patent Baristas) The post-Bilski landscape: Why some tried, but failed, to ban ‘business method’ patents (Prior… [read post]