Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 301 - 320 of 157,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm by MBettman
On June 11, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:13 am by lennyesq
  Abortion access now is a state-by-state patchwork of laws that is ever-changing as new restrictions take effect. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post United States v Ballard and Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Regina (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme dealing with the referral of a recalled mental patient to a mental health review tribunal was not incompatible with the patient's rights under article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:36 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) Queen’s Bench Division “Fair trial provisions guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights could not be overcome by a claim that the offended party's case had no possible chance of success. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:47 am
Alton and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An organisation that had no capacity to carry on terrorist activities and was taking no steps to acquire such capacity or otherwise to promote or encourage terrorist activities could not be said to be concerned in terrorism simply because its leaders had the contingent intention to resort to terrorism in the future. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:07 am
GO and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Overseas students could change their courses but if they wanted an extension of stay in the United Kingdom, they had to be able to produce evidence of satisfactory progress, whether on the course named in the application for entry clearance or on another recognised course. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Brian LaBovick
The important question being decided is whether corruption will be given a loophole to escape responsibility.Qui tam/False Claims Act/Whistleblower laws were created to…Read more →The post Zoltan Barati for the State of Florida v Motorola: The Most Important Question in Florida Whistleblower Law is Being Decided in This Matter. appeared first on LaBovick Law Group. [read post]