Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 301 - 320
of 19,463
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
"San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Mark McCloskey, Pardoned for Brandishing Guns at Protesters, Can't Get the Guns Back
26 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm
In Fay v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:02 am
Marks of St. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
As to the combination between colour and shapes, the Court mentioned another similar case decided by the EU General Court with reference to the green square illustrated on the right (decision in Case T‑282/09, Fédération internationale des logis v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
Public Patent Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:50 am
The most recent appeal marks the sixth time that Mr. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States... [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:51 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:04 pm
Eleven months after ruling that taxing damage awards for nonphysical compensatory damages violated the United States Constitution, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has reversed itself in Murphy v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States , 133 S. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:54 am
No, says the Dutch Court of Appeal in The Hague, although its reasoning is a little creative when it comes to its application of EU trade mark law.The decision is Zhu v Great Blue Sky Internationaland dates back to December 2013. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 8:36 am
Mark Spognardi Jesse Dill Arnstein & Lehr Chicago Partner Mark A. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 pm
The result is that the scope of patentable subject matter is certainly narrowed from its 1998 high-water-mark. * * * * * In Bilski v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This can no longer be allowed in view of the comments in Bovemij Verzekeringen NV v Benelux Merkenbureau, Case C-108/05 [EUROPOLIS], which makes clear that the mark must be distinctive in the whole of the territory of the member state [Merpel would like a little clarification here: is this what Bovemij clearly established?]. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm
linkSomerset, Red was assigned to Republican states in the annual election night maps used by the TV networks. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 2:24 am
Omega SA (Omega AG) (Omega LTD.) v. [read post]
