Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 301 - 320
of 61,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
See Hudson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
This means no theocracies, dictatorships, or hereditary oligarchies. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Moore v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:54 am
In an 8-1 opinion in Kemp v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:33 am
In TriMed v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
The Facts of State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:06 pm
“NECESSARY” MEANS WHAT MUST BE DONE FOR SOMETHING ELSE TO BE DONE “PROPER” MEANS FOR A LEGITIMATE PUBLIC PURPOSE, REASONABLE, AND JUST “CARRYING” MEANS MAKING AN EFFORT “EXECUTION” MEANS AN ENFORCEMENT EFFORT It is performance of an official enforcement act. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:30 am
This week a seven strong bench of the Supreme Court will hear an important appeal concerning statelessness, Secretary for State of the Home Department v B2. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 pm
Initially, in State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 5:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:42 pm
However, just as it seemed that preliminary issue trials on meaning were now the done thing, Nicklin J refused permission for one in Mohammed Dahlan v Middle East Eye Ltd ([2019] EWHC 2261 (QB)), stating that a preliminary issue trial will have little to no benefit where a public interest defence is the principal defence being run (unless the meaning was not found to be defamatory at all), because meaning does not set the parameters of that defence… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:19 am
The United States Supreme Court further limited the holding of its landmark case of Miranda v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 12:09 pm
That generally means state court. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In Washington v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:05 pm
Such a rejection might eliminate any possibility of federal court review of any state court decision reviewing, construing, or applying state laws governing federal elections where such decisions focus solely on the meaning of state statutes and state constitutional provisions. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam); [2011] WLR (D) 283 “Pursuant to section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 it was not in the best interests of a patient diagnosed as being in a minimally conscious state to authorise the withdrawal of all life sustaining treatment including nutrition and hydration by artifical means (‘ANH’).” WLR Daily, 28th September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
After discussing what Murthy v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am
(“CWA”), the Supreme Court has examined the meaning of the term “waters of the United States. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:18 am
(“CWA”), the Supreme Court has examined the meaning of the term “waters of the United States. [read post]
