Search for: "State v. Miner" Results 301 - 320 of 1,488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Sherin and Lodgen
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am by Charles Sartain
Here we continue our discussion of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:04 am by Charles Sartain
The question for the Texas Supreme Court in Piranha Partners et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm by Richard W. Parker
Hundreds of miners died before Congress finally enacted a meaningful Mine Safety Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Jessica Clogg
Canada (Attorney General) and Coastal GasLink Pipeline Ltd v Huson. [read post]