Search for: "State v. N. L." Results 301 - 320 of 5,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care June 2019: “[L]imits on duties of care exist for policy reasons that have been explored, debated and developed over many years. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am by James Segroves
However, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed an analogous situation in Bowen v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care June 2019: "[L]imits on duties of care exist for policy reasons that have been explored, debated and developed over many years. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:13 am by Just Security
Eisen (@NormEisen), Siven Watt (@SivenWatt), Joshua Kolb and Joshua Stanton (@StantonLaw) In Trump Case, Procedures Exist to Safeguard the Former President’s Right to an Impartial Jury by Debra Perlin (@DebraPerlin) Congress v State Department Congress Can Investigate the Afghanistan Withdrawal Without Compromising a Vital Dissent Channel  by Ambassador Daniel Fried (@AmbDanFried) Foreign Investment in Social Media/Technology How Lawmakers Hope to Sidestep Existing… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
See id. at 2123 & n.1 (noting that forty-three states are "shall-issue" states, in which pretty much all law-abidi [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]