Search for: "State v. Nichols" Results 301 - 320 of 608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2016, 10:28 pm by Nassiri Law
Additional Resources: New California Law Boosts Worker Protections For School Leave, January 6, 2016, Capital Public Radio, By Chris Nichols More Blog Entries: Walz v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 7:14 pm
  The case is People v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
In holding this to unpatentable, Nicholls LJ stated at 327 that “his program makes a more efficient use of a computer's resources. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am by Matthew Hill
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am by Samantha Fry
Nichols dismisses case, finding there was no conspiracy between the committee and New York state officials; therefore, the D.C. court has no personal jurisdiction. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:00 am by Lisa
The media frenzy so tainted the case that the United States Supreme Court released him and ordered a 1966 retrial in the case Sheppard v. [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 9:51 am
In Nichols Institute Diagnostics v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
I have been following with interest the software patent case of Symbian v Comptroller General for Patents. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am by Francis Davey
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]