Search for: "State v. Pac" Results 301 - 320 of 719
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2015, 7:10 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: PAC Anchor Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm by Joe Consumer
If you were paying attention to arguments yesterday, you may have heard about this one: Williams-Yulee v. the Florida Bar, “a challenge to a Florida rule barring judicial candidates from personally requesting campaign contributions. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 11:00 am
  That was until millions of dollars of out of state PAC money coming from a few billionaires like the Koch brothers and casino magnate Sheldon Adelson funded the Drug Free America group attempting to defeat the amendment. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:10 am by Jani
This question was answered first when gaming was in its infancy, but still remains quite relevant in today's world of gaming and law.The case in question was Atari v North American Philips Consumer Electronics, decided by the United States Court of Appeals in 1982. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:11 pm
Philippines, ICSID, and Counsel Disqualification: The Power and the Praxis Crina Baltag, “Denial of Benefits” Clause in Pac Rim v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm by Kevin Newman, Esq.
District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, is General Majority PAC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]