Search for: "State v. Pillar"
Results 301 - 320
of 467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 10:05 am
Near v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
The UK Supreme Court decisions are in alignment with the ethos of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (“Ruggie Principles”), particularly the pillar focusing on greater access by victims to an effective remedy. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:14 am
BRI does not yet embrace such formal arrangements between foreign states without China at the center. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:55 pm
Washington Square v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:34 am
The EU Aarhus Regulation says it enforces all three elements (or pillars, in Euro-speak). [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
The employee’s failure to accommodate claim also advanced (Shepherd v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
In the Optis v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:55 pm
Judge Shack stated, “Steven J. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The Supreme Court stated in Schick v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:56 am
The Brazilian Constitution establishes access to health as a pillar of the democratic state. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am
They provide the normative and operational standard for the implementation of the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for business and human rights structured around three pillars:[3]• The State duty to protect against human rights abuses by third parties, including business enterprises, through policies, regulation and adjudication. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 7:36 pm
As the United States Supreme Court ruled in Linn v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
In United States Trust Company of New York v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
No. 17-01005-ess.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
" United States v. [read post]