Search for: "State v. Ping"
Results 301 - 320
of 335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 7:46 am
Ones to Watch for 2010: The AmeriKat will be keeping her eyes and whiskers out for the exciting IP stories of 2010 including updates on the bubbling-under of the malevolent ACTA (here and here), the ping-pong saga of Nokia v Apple (here and here), i4i v Microsoft, and the international copyright consequences Premier League v You Tube (and here). [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:51 pm
Dec. 18, 2009)(per curiam) (Whistleblower case remanded in light of decision, holding in State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:38 pm
Any time there is a bank to bank dollar transaction, the funds "ping" a bank in New York (I borrowed the word ping from the computer world because I think it fits what actually happens). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:00 am
The Third Circuit decision I referred to above is Shubert v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL’s efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims – ActionAid’s unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
§ § 1-16, to the exclusion of any provisions of state law that are inconsistent with the federal act. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MacKreth (Deceased), R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1849 (08 September 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Historic Buildings Monuments Commission for England (English Heritage) & Ors v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 2287 (Admin) (17 September 2009) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Tai Ping Carpets UK [...] [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Ill. 1977): Magnavox argued that defendants had infringed on its patent & concept of electronic ping-pong with their Pong-like games.The Magnavox Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:31 pm
[pdf] View Electronic Briefs in Tex. 2009 No. 06-1071 STATE FARM LLOYDS v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:27 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:15 pm
Earlier this week, in the FCC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Dismissed employee precluded from litigating her termination because of her failure to exhaust her administrative remediesMatter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 2009 NY Slip Op 50147(U), Decided on January 23, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County [Not officially published]Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I, a position in the non-competitive class, was terminated from her position. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:50 pm
Espinosa v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 10:17 pm
" I'm prompted to write about this subject based on a one paragraph Order by Judge Tennille earlier this year in Bank of America Corporation v. [read post]
