Search for: "State v. Ponds" Results 301 - 320 of 434
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari (forthcoming) Brief in opposition (forthcoming) Amicus brief of Northern California Relief (forthcoming)   Downing/Salt Pond Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:39 am by Howard Knopf
 For example, it would have been interesting and useful to hear more about the forthcoming SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Limited case at the ECJ case about whether copyright should extend to the functionality of computer programs and why it is that the ECJ will hear this case, an issue clearly resolved about 25 years ago on this side of the pond. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:09 pm
It also claims that "artificial lakes or ponds, including farm and stock ponds" are not covered under the new guidance document. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:41 am by Christopher Mathews
  The Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals tackled that somewhat messy issue with its recent decision and order in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Michelle Yeary
Fla. 2003) (sales rep and pharmaceutical manufacturer have no duty to control doctor’s prescribing practices)).While we have dipped our toe into this pond in the past (see prior post Riegel Toothpaste (Adkins v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
Richard Moorhead in Lawyer Watch showed us what we can learn from our friends across the pond about how to help litigants in person. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:24 pm
” (See MedImmune v Genentech, 549 U.S. 118, at 127 (Sup Ct, 2007)), the Court moved to consider the main issue at play in the case: patentable subject-matter. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
The same headaches faced in Europe are also faced by producers on the other side of the pond. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:06 am by stu@crimapp.com
Justice Markman found that the Court’s ruling was a repudiation of the Michigan Supreme Court’s ruling Pond v People -- a Michigan case adopted throughout the nation. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]