Search for: "State v. Pounds"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
Donnelly v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:44 am
In the alternative, it stated that repudiatory breach was accepted by notice of termination via email on 7 July. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
But Pennsylvania state law seems to follow the Richardson line of reasoning in, Philadelphia Electric Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
As will become clear, I lean towards the second option… RH v North Tyneside Council v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (HB) [2010] UKUT 462 (AAC) This was a housing benefit appeal, indeed the second HB appeal related to this matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:47 am
Similar findings were made in Massey; he received £600. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
Aggravated damages for discrimination In HM Land Registry v McGlue, the EAT overturned the Tribunal’s decision to award £5000 aggravated damages to the Claimant, making clear that there is a high hurdle to reach before such damages will be appropriate in successful discrimination cases. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:25 pm
The hospital was ordered to pay 1000 pounds to the family. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am
In the last two years the Supreme Court has grappled with this conundrum in various ways: in relation to control orders; allegations of terrorist financing (SSHD v AF [2009] UKHL 28); compensation for those who have suffered miscarriage of justice (R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18); and criminal conduct as the subject of disciplinary proceedings (R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:28 am
In Ruppel v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:22 am
The appellants argued specific statutory rights are not to be cut down by subordinate legislation passed under the vires of a different Act, a rule identified in the case of R v Secretary of State for Social Security, Ex p Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants [1997] 1 WLR 275 (“JCWI”). [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 8:43 am
Charly stated in evidence that she is in the first year of a law degree. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
By the time of the appeal the value of her claim had been agreed at £2.25m so the sums at stake were substantial. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
Romania, no. 42250/02, 1 July 2008 and Frodl v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 6:30 am
This would make the value of the pension share £138,534. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:00 pm
And, in any event, the employer's version of the facts wasn’t “material,” given its concession that no lifting devices (as required by law) had been supplied.The AD1 sure closed the door on that ….# # #DECISIONJFT v 1211 6th Ave. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
In June 2019, Canadian authorities arrested nine people who reportedly smuggled over one million pounds of tobacco (valued at CA $110 million). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
In June 2019, Canadian authorities arrested nine people who reportedly smuggled over one million pounds of tobacco (valued at CA $110 million). [read post]
