Search for: "State v. R. V. B."
Results 301 - 320
of 15,491
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
R. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am
She relies particularly on section 149(1)(b), arguing that the Secretary of State had failed to have due regard to the need to advance equality of opportunity for persons who share a relevant protected characteristic (in this case being a Palestinian refugee) as compared with persons who do not share it (in this case, other refugees). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Further, the Appellate Division opined that "[r]easonable defensive measures do not violate the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII, even though such steps are adverse to the charging employee and result in differential treatment", citing United States v New York City Tr. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:13 pm
From Silverman v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Sandford, by William B Meyer, Colgate University. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:56 am
” Linda R. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:46 am
This post will cover the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Smith v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
R. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Fanga, R. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The case is Villalpando v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:00 pm
Nevertheless, the foreseeability of death does not need to be established in the context of manslaughter (see: R v Creighton, 1993 CanLII 61 (SCC), [1993] 3 SCR 3). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm
R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am
For example, a lawyer moving from one firm to another might find herself expected to participate in a case in which she was involved in her former firm; this might raise questions of confidentiality, as well as adherence to other law society rules (R. v. [read post]
