Search for: "State v. Reagan"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,087
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
Niemeyer (appointed to the federal bench by President Reagan in 1987); Donald W. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
Then, quoting Standard Oil v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm
Neither did Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:07 am
Hajec is Director of Litigation at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which filed an amicus brief in support of the administration in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Plainly, he does not, and presidents like Jefferson, FDR, and Reagan play important roles in his account. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
Indeed, kids do a lot of copying that isn’t even noticed as copying: trace the letters to learn how to write; instruction where we have students watch then do, which is to say copy, then teach, which is to say have others copy you; perhaps this can often be distinguished as processes v. outputs, but copying letters is copying outputs, not just tasks. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
As Kersch comments, in both of these widely seen film series, “Roe v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Under Ake v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm
Bush and Ronald Reagan, he wrote briefs stating clearly his view that Roe had been wrongly decided and should be overturned. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
The analysis is lengthy, so I will state my main conclusions here: None of the critics defends the report’s actual reasoning, which is pretty obviously flawed. [read post]
16 May 2019, 6:30 am
Levinson and Balkin mention Shelby County v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
Less familiar is a problem that is perhaps the obverse: plural and incompatible ways of generating claims to say “yes,” to give the final word on who shall rule and what the state shall do. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Nixon doubled down on the Southern Strategy during the general election, capturing six southern states compared to one for Democrat Hubert Humphrey. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
The Ninth Circuit held today in Prado v. [read post]
