Search for: "State v. Robertson" Results 301 - 320 of 644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2019, 7:14 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
The decision of Rokt Pte Ltd v Commissioner of Patents provides a useful guide to companies seeking to patent (and so protect and monetise their investment in) CIIs as to what factors will be relevant to persuading a Court that such inventions are patentable subject matter. [read post]
7 May 2019, 7:14 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
The decision of Rokt Pte Ltd v Commissioner of Patents provides a useful guide to companies seeking to patent (and so protect and monetise their investment in) CIIs as to what factors will be relevant to persuading a Court that such inventions are patentable subject matter. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily looks at Peruta v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 7:18 am by Jennifer Davis
In 1964, she took up the second important case of her career, United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Absent an express agreement, an attorney is not a guarantor of a particular result (see Byrnes v Palmer, 18 App Div at 4; see also 1B NY PJI3d 2:152, at 140-141 [2012]), and may not be held "liable in negligence for . . . the exercise of appropriate judgment that leads to an unsuccessful result" (Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467; see Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645, 646; see also PJI 2:152). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Venkat
This news is probably depressing to two groups of plaintiffs who recently sued Facebook: Robertson v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
State Farm Mutual, No. 20693, Order (Portsmouth Sep. 14, 1995); Schoonmaker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:47 am by Kalvis Golde
Valenzuela 21-1598Issue: Whether under Robertson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
Robertson CountyBd. of Ed., 692 S.W.2d 863, 871. [read post]