Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 301 - 320 of 71,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 12:34 pm
United States, No. 06-1164, and Federal Express Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by sally
& Ors v Asda Stores Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 494 (26 April 2012) Adamjee v R. [2012] EWCA Crim 793 (26 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Transport for London (TfL) v Griffin & Ors [2012] EWHC 1105 (QB) (26 April 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Lilleyman v Lilleyman & Anor [2012] EWHC 1056 (Ch) (26 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Y, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:08 am by Alan Brackett
As we reported, on June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Lucia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:02 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dean & Dean Solicitors v Dionissiou -Moussaoui [2011] EWCA Civ 1331 (17 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Vinall & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 6252 (16 November 2011) Carpenter, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2568 (11 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Glenn & Co (Essex) Ltd & Ors v HM Commissioners for Revenue and Customs & Anor [2011] EWHC 2998 (Admin) (16 November 2011)… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 3:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 37For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary & Anor [2014] UKSC 37 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:26 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McKeown v British Horseracing Authority [2010] EWHC 508 (QB) (12 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Rowe, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 524 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Cooperative Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Northumberland County Council [2010] EWHC 373 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Raw, R (on the application of)… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 am by sally
Supreme Court London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 (23 February 2011) Forsyth, R v [2011] UKSC 9 (23 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Daley- Murdock, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161 (23 February 2011) Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162 (23 February 2011) Berezovsky v Abramovich [2011] EWCA Civ 153 (23… [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:20 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Zarezadeh, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 271 (01 March 2011) Hackett v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 380 (01 March 2011) Grout, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 299 (01 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) LO (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 164 (01 March 2011) Korashi v Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board [2011] EWCA Civ 187 (01 March 2011) High… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:30 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McCluskey v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1197 (06 July 2010) Winter & Anor v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1474 (06 July 2010) Martin v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 1450 (06 July 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 773 (06 July 2010) ENE 1 Kos Ltd. v Petroleo Brasileiro SA [2010] EWCA Civ 772 (06 July 2010) High Court… [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
In Monday’s decision in the newly minted, Matal v. [read post]