Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 301 - 320 of 71,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2024, 9:54 am by Giles Peaker
Willott, R (On the Application Of) v Eastbourne Borough Council (2024) EWHC 113 (Admin) A judicial review of Eastbourne’s allocation policy and of Eastbourne’s decision to exclude Ms Willott from joining the housing register on grounds of ‘serious anti social behaviour’. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Cunningham (Georgia State University College of Law) & Ute Römer-Barron (Georgia State University) has posted Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
Biggs claimed that despite the act’s passage, US Attorney General Merrick Garland told Marshals to “avoid arresting protestors” at the homes of multiple Supreme Court Justices after a leaked copy of the court’s proposed ruling in the abortion rights case Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:38 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Children's Rights "Children’s Rights and partners Bass, Berry & Sims PLC and McDermott Will & Emery LLP, filed a lawsuit against Tennessee’s Department of Children’s Services (DCS) on behalf of immigrant minor children placed in Tennessee’s foster system and Advocates for Immigrants Rights (AIR), a nonprofit law firm that provides legal services to immigrants. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by Covington & Burling LLP
”  A press release accompanying the bill’s introduction stated that Congressman Pallone introduced the bill “to protect consumers from the bombardment of dangerous and unwanted calls and texts that have been exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
There is therefore a “disagreement which affects the result” within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
“Relocation” means: (1) a change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in the county of Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry, or Will to a new residence within this State that is more than 25 miles from the child’s current residence, as measured by an Internet mapping service; (2) a change of residence from the child’s current primary residence located in a county not listed in paragraph (1) to a new… [read post]