Search for: "State v. Santos"
Results 301 - 320
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
Take the case of Franco-Santos v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Santos v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:38 pm
See US v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:38 pm
See US v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:07 pm
See Perritt et al v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Holyfield[48] and overturned its decision, from Claymore v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
If a party wanted the court to adopt the exception, it appears that an argument similar to the one adopted in the California Court of Appeals case, In re Santos Y.[22] could be used. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:01 am
Under these standards, the court said that it could not say that the supervisor’s testimony did not support the findings of guilt and declined to disturb the Board’s determinations.As to the penalties imposed, the court said that much deference is to be afforded to an agency’s determination regarding a sanction, especially in situations where, as here, matters of internal discipline in a law enforcement organization are concerned, quoting from Santos v Chesworth,… [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 6:26 am
") AC31462 - State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Siers: Reasoning that, under State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:15 am
The ECHR's judgment is found here: Klein v Russia, European Court of Human Rights From the Court's Final Judgment April 1, 2010. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:02 am
Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (2008)). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:04 pm
United States, Case No. 09-1387 (C.D. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:21 pm
" See United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:05 pm
In a sort of unusual procedural backdrop, the petitioner in United States v. [read post]