Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 301 - 320
of 11,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
He referred to Rev Charles Odeke Akunya v Registered Trustees of Church of Uganda (HCCS No 305 of 2020) and Rev Canon Cyrus Adiga Nakari v Rt Rev Sabino Ocan Odoki (HCSS No 2 of 2017) and cited Justice Mubiru: “… the courts may refrain from adjudicating purely religious matters, save where the right to property or to an office depends on the questions as to religious faith, belief, doctrine or creed as the courts may be handicapped to enter into the hazardous… [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:50 am
When I was a student, the first day of my “Administrative & Regulatory State” course featured discussion of a single case: Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” In NAACP v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 12:24 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 863; Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
From Brown v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:59 am
Questions about particular documents, such as “Does the Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 11:34 am
When the author first asserts his version of the proportionality requirement, he cites the International Court of Justice’s merits judgment in Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:00 am
The clause states: C. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
’ Davies v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 3:14 am
When we talk about the ‘matrimonial pot’, this does not always mean just the assets you own jointly, e.g. property and savings. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:10 am
In Hile v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 11:13 am
We will save you a tedious detailing of every case in which GAO sustained a protest and, instead, below provide some key examples of what won and why. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:25 am
When the first wave of those newborns reaches working age in 2041 -- admittedly sooner in Arkansas -- will Social Security be saved? [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
V. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 am
McDonough v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Uddin v. [read post]
