Search for: "State v. Singh "
Results 301 - 320
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
” Plumley v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Lee, Acting Director, Patent & Trademark Office, 14-424. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
He tweets at @VarunKesar999 [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
In Singh v Pierpont, 2014 WL 6471374 (D. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Bank of America’s lawyers will be having a side of research with their turkey this Thanksgiving, as the Court granted cert. in the once-relisted twins Bank of America v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
And the firm's Tejinder Singh serves as counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
First up are a pair of bankruptcy petitions that are “identical in substance”: Bank of America v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
Over the weekend, the United States and its allies conducted 22 air strikes against ISIS forces inside Iraq. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
Justice DeStefano also rejected Singh’s contention that Radburn no longer was a shareholder of MSN, stating that “at this juncture, [Radburn] is still a 45% shareholder of MSN and the value of [his] shares has not yet been determined notwithstanding [Singh's] 2009 election to purchase,” and that “[i]n the absence of any evidence indicating that [Radburn] sold or… [read post]
Second Circuit Affirms Official Acts Immunity for Pakistani ISI Chiefs; Rejects Jus Cogens Exception
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
”) The Second Circuit panel rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that courts are not required to defer to Executive branch SoIs and that there is, or should be, a jus cogens exception to official acts immunity, holding that it was bound by the Circuit’s prior decision in Matar v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:36 am
See, eg, Rosenberg v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
In the case of John Richard Brady v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 8:43 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
(The age of consent was raised to 14 and more in many U.S. states in the 20th century. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
It appeared to remain the law that where a conclusion was “objectively verifiable” it was not defensible as comment (although reconciling Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350 is not straight forward on this). [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
