Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2008, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:19 am
The United States Supreme Court further limited the holding of its landmark case of Miranda v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:02 am
United States, No. 23-5572. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:37 pm
So, I suppose Justice Sotomayor, contrary to her Senate testimony, is okay with the use of international precedent to strike down laws passed by 37 states. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:47 am
United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
Braxton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:28 pm
On February 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:28 pm
On February 20, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:13 am
On February 22, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:38 am
United States, the first case in which Justices Kagan and Sotomayor disagreed on the judgment. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Allen v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm
Ball State University ___ U. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:01 am
United States, No. 19-8709. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:23 am
In June, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor attracted attention for her dissent in Utah v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:30 am
As Justice Sotomayor highlighted in her United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Tweet Tags: racial preferences, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme CourtSchuette v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm
Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:39 pm
In McCleskey v. [read post]
