Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 301 - 320
of 5,802
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
" Justices Barrett, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan signed on to parts of Justice Gorsuch's opinion, providing a majority that let the law stand. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:49 pm
However, in a concurring opinion at the time, Justice Sotomayor instructed that the question of whether an individual who is compelled to arbitrate a PAGA claim has standing (or the legal ability) to pursue a collective PAGA action in such cases is a matter of state law. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:47 pm
On July 17, 2023, the California Supreme Court decided an important state law issue raised by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:18 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway, and United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:39 pm
Justice Sotomayor’s concurring opinion in Viking stated that “[o]f course, if this Court’s understanding of state law is wrong, California courts, in an appropriate case, will have the last word. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:40 am
In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court in Viking River v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 7:55 pm
Why it matters: After overturning Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:16 pm
In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court in Viking River v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
In Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Although the Court did not explicitly overrule Grutter v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023). [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
And, because “not all blacks in the United States were former slaves,” “ ‘freedman’ ” was a decidedly underinclusive proxy for race. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:09 am
Think, perhaps, of the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am
" Justice Sotomayor explains further: The Supreme Court of the United States declares that a particular kind of business, though open to the public, has a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
