Search for: "State v. Tate"
Results 301 - 320
of 446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 9:54 pm
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 1:03 pm
An interesting decision from the Arizona Court of Appeals last Thursday, in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
And so, following primary elections, the Republican Party nominated in his place Lieutenant Governor Tate Reeves. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:06 am
Kellogs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:33 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:30 pm
Sacks, P.C. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Fearn & Ors v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery (2023) UKSC 4 – can ‘visual intrusion’ by overlooking amount to actionable nuisance? [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities: Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld… [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
2 May 2019, 1:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:56 pm
” But as the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bush v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:49 pm
Its ruling in State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:38 pm
Woods v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:08 am
In Mayorga v Tate (302 AD2d 11 [2d Dept 2002]), the assignee of the executor of the decedent’s estate brought a legal malpractice action against the decedent’s attorney and sought to obtain pretrial disclosure “of the file that [the attorney] maintained in connection with” his representation of the decedent (id. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:32 am
U.S. v. [read post]
