Search for: "State v. Tri-State Pharmaceutical"
Results 301 - 320
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
Plaintiff next tried to argue differential diagnosis. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Mayo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:22 pm
The state had tried to argue that regulating data was akin to regulating a commodity, but of course, it is not. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 8:22 pm
The state had tried to argue that regulating data was akin to regulating a commodity, but of course, it is not. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:19 am
He didn't file suit, however, until June 2009.Dead to rights under the Texas two-year statute of limitations, plaintiff tried to argue that his claim didn't "accrue" until there was scientific evidence sufficient to satisfy Texas' version of Daubert, which was imposed in Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am
- New EDPA case requiring unsuccessful plaintiff to pay as costs part of cost of complying with its ediscovery demands - Link.June 16, 2011: It Should Be An Interesting Couple Of Weeks - Analysis of new Supreme Court Smith v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:19 pm
The state statute very explicitly tried to make those meetings less useful to doctors by making the drug sales rep less well-prepared. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
The patents were owned jointly by MedImmune and MRC, who alleged that they had been infringed by Novartis’ sales of ranibizumab, a pharmaceutical product sold under the trade mark Lucentis and is approved for the treatment of an eye condition known as wet age-related macular degeneration. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
[He] has no basis to apply his opinions reliably to the pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
In, Pliva v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm
In White v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:24 pm
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:19 am
* EFF on how the Kerry-McCain privacy bill would preempt state law [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 2010 WL 1463035, at *1 (D.N.J. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:00 am
In Barnhill v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
On the other hand, companies supporting i4i heavily rely on patent protection, and include originating pharmaceutical companies as well as start-ups. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am
" Id. at 10 (quoting Highland Capital Mgmt., L.P. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 1:24 pm
This morning the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
