Search for: "State v. Wines"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
For example, 27 CFR 4.35(a)(2)(v) defines “vinted”—when used in the name/address statement on the label—to mean that “the named winery, at the stated address, subjected the wine to cellar treatment in accordance with §4.22(c). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
For example, 27 CFR 4.35(a)(2)(v) defines “vinted”—when used in the name/address statement on the label—to mean that “the named winery, at the stated address, subjected the wine to cellar treatment in accordance with §4.22(c). [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 8:21 am
” In Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:39 am
The final case is Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:02 am
Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm
Every trendy café these days seems to have a selection of dairy-free milk alternatives as long as a wine list, from the usual suspects like soy, coconut and almond, to more unusual new favourites like rice, hemp, pea, flax and oat. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm
Every trendy café these days seems to have a selection of dairy-free milk alternatives as long as a wine list, from the usual suspects like soy, coconut and almond, to more unusual new favourites like rice, hemp, pea, flax and oat. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:46 am
The post Wine Spectator v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
Maryland v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 4:54 am
Jive Commerce, LLC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:42 am
Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Infringement of any of the easyGroup trademarksArticle 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(c) EU Trade Mark RegulationEasy CatIf the only similarity between the trade mark and the sign complained of is a common element that is descriptive or otherwise of low distinctiveness, that points against there being a likelihood of confusion (Whyte and Mackay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch), [2015] FSR 33 at [43]-[44]).Consequently, there was no infringement of any of the easyGroup… [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 3:04 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
This article’s thesis is that to whatever degree digital media poses a threat of disruption to a common law legal system, this disruptive effect will be more acute in Canada than in the United States or England. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
The laws at issue permitted in-state wineries only to sell to retailers and consumers and prohibited the importation of more than a gallon of out-of-state wine for personal use without a special permit from the state of New Jersey. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
Thomas McCarthy discusses (here) the CAFC's ruling in the INSIGNIA case, Joseph Phelps Vineyards, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
” Heather Long for the Washington Post reports that Collins “said Sunday she would not vote for any judge who wanted to end access to abortion in the United States by overturning Roe v. [read post]
