Search for: "State v. Yates" Results 301 - 320 of 423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2012, 4:34 pm by war
Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 102 Share on Facebook [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm by Matthew Bush
TuiteDocket: 11-1094Issue(s): Whether a federal court may grant habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner without determining that the state court’s “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” ruling was objectively unreasonable.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below [Yates v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
Solicitor General *Jeff Yates (Binghamton University) Discussant: Susan A. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am by INFORRM
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45)  he should have omitted the word… [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The former Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner John Yates, who resigned amid the phone hacking scandal earlier in 2011, “has been appointed to oversee reform of the police force in Bahrain,” reports the Press Association. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:08 am by war
The Full Federal Court (Dowsett, Foster and Yates JJ) has allowed Samsung’s appeal from Bennett J’s decision and discharged the interlocutory injunctions against the Galaxy Tab 10.1. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 5:18 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
On appeal, Justice Bennett, Justice Nicholas and Justice Yates have found that the relevant claims of the XR patent are invalid, and that the primary judge erred in finding that they were entitled to the benefit the priority date of United States Patent Application No 60/14006, filed on 25 March 1996. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last week, in State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 121 (15 September 2011) Appeal from: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1169 See also: Innovation Patent Claims Once Again Construed Narrowly Claim construction –  whether ‘device’ encompasses apparatus in two parts In an appeal from a decision of Justice Barker in the Federal Court of Australia, a full bench of the court comprising Justices Bennett, Gilmour and… [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by war
Gummow J at one point stated, you need a database directive. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:31 am by tracey
Bridge Trustees Ltd v Yates and others (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening) [2011] UKSC 42;  [2011] WLR (D)  267 “Equilibrium of assets and liabilities was not a requirement of the definition of a money purchase pension scheme under section 181 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993.” WLR Daily, 27th July 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]