Search for: "State v. Z. A. B."
Results 301 - 320
of 418
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 12:27 pm
§3121(b)(10), was one of ambiguity that could be left to regulatory interpretation.In Chase Bank v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Such case law makes it clear that where the business assets in relation to which the opposition was filed have been transferred and at the same time the transferor has contractually agreed to transfer the opposition to the transferee, the status of opponent stays with the transferor until (a) evidence has been filed with the Office sufficiently evidencing the transfer and (b) a request has been filed to recognise the transfer of the status of opponent. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:00 am
During fiscal year 2010, the highest paid executive was Mark V. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
I-B. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:01 am
In Bosque v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:01 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Property Law Opinions Body: SC18417 - Alexandre v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:22 pm
B. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:40 am
Velander v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Mark B. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm
Mattel v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 5:35 am
The investor-state dispute settlement mechanism has been the subject of criticism in the United States, Canada and Mexico. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 10:39 am
Now for something serious and not so serious at times - the ABCs of HST: A is for Almost Everything - HST covers almost everything; B is for Bookkeeping - Registrants need to keep detailed records and maintain books are records that can be audited by the Canada Revenue Agency Auditors; C is for Canada Revenue Agency - The CRA enforces the HST (both the GST and PVAT portions); D is for Documentary Requirements - A top 10 audit issue is that registrations do not maintain adequate… [read post]
