Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 301 - 320
of 698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
” At Just Security, Steve Vladeck discusses the amicus brief opposing certiorari in a challenge to the constitutionality of the military death penalty. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Roger Alford and Steve Vladeck debate the wisdom of this kind of accountability here and here. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
Vladeck: Let's answer the question about the regulatory impact of commercial speech doctrine. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 3:30 am
In light of these questions, it’s hard to imagine a more timely and relevant constitutional law article than Lindsay Wiley and Steve Vladeck’s forthcoming article. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
Law Professor Steve Vladeck has this post at SCOTUSblog on yesterday's argument in Davila v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:40 am
” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:58 pm
By Steve Vladeck, professor at the University of Texas School of Law The effective end of the Supreme Court’s term on Friday touched off what has become an annual tradition: hot takes summarizing the justices’ work over the preceding nine months based upon data aggregated from the justices’ decisions. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:30 am
Steve Vladeck When Congress chartered the federal judicial system in the Judiciary Act of 1789, the creation of a chief legal officer for the government—an attorney general—was almost an afterthought. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:24 am
Jack Goldsmith will deliver the keynote address and the commenters are Robert Chesney, Deborah Pearlstein, and Steve Vladeck; Dan Marcus will moderate. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:24 pm
Two weeks ago, I had a few posts discussing the scope of detention authority authorized under section 1031 of the then-pending SASC version of the NDAA, in response to Steve Vladeck’s concern that the language could be read to encompass detention of persons having nothing to do with the 9/18/01 AUMF. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:44 am
Bellia (Notre Dame), Heather Elliott (Alabama), Evan Lee (UC-Hastings), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), Jim Pfander (Northwestern), Amanda Tyler (UC-Berkeley), and Steve Vladeck (American). [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 3:30 am
Steve Vladeck It is a common rhetorical trope among far too many federal judges (including Supreme Court Justices) that legal scholarship is of diminishing utility to them and their work, at least in part because scholars have turned their gaze to topics too far removed from those relevant to the deliberations of contemporary jurists. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:48 am
Levinson, in conversation with Steve Vladeck, a nationally recognized expert on the role of the federal courts in the war on terrorism, and Gene Healy, distinguished author and expert on executive power, the role of the presidency, and federalism, will explore the relevance of The Federalist to today’s politics.Join the Brennan Center and ACS for an engaging discussion with one of America’s most distinguished constitutional scholars on… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:16 am
Back in 2006, Steve Vladeck did a post about what type of "punishment" there should be for a student exceeding the word limit on an exam. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 7:22 am
Nixon (Steve Vladeck, One First) The post The morning read for Wednesday, April 5 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
Steve Vladeck Seventy years ago, Robert L. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
Steve Vladeck has recently posted a characteristically sharp take on this issue. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 3:30 am
Steve Vladeck Most of what lawyers learn about the “Interbellum Constitution”–i.e., constitutional law between the end of the War of 1812 and the beginning of the Civil War—comes from the handful of major Supreme Court decisions of that era that law schools still teach as part of the required first-year curriculum. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:51 am
Steve Vladeck previewed Ross for this blog, with law students Mark Denton and Jessica Kim covering it for Cornell. [read post]
